From 86d5a0714fac27fd63690692e2cebbaf0a8e9ce5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brendan Forster Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 10:16:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] fixed the typo --- docs/strong-naming.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/strong-naming.md b/docs/strong-naming.md index e8d623f6..988751c6 100644 --- a/docs/strong-naming.md +++ b/docs/strong-naming.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ A while ago we had an [epic discussion](https://github.com/octokit/octokit.net/issues/405) about whether or not to strong name Octokit.net - thanks for all the feedback, by the way - and we've finally settled on what we're going to do with Octokit.net. -At some point between now and the 1.0 release, we will organise strong naming to be added to the build process. Lots of people read this discussion as the team being opposed to strong naming - but that's not the case. +At some point between now and the 1.0 release, we will organize strong naming to be added to the build process. Lots of people read this discussion as the team being opposed to strong naming - but that's not the case. So why are we doing this?