mirror of
https://github.com/zoriya/v10.git
synced 2026-08-16 02:45:09 +00:00
Rebuild relocation from the config-bundle (createRelocation + self-discriminating
origin-discoverer) into a DOM-free per-source reactor plus DOM config-pipeline
steps, per the presentation-timeline design + review.
- behaviors/establish-start-media-time.ts (new, DOM-free): the reactor — 3 states
(inactive clears the transient slot per source / monitoring runs the injected
deriveStartMediaTime seam -> writes Track.startMediaTime / established disables it).
Owns mediaContainerData on state; selection optional/defensive; never touches pipelines.
- behaviors/dom/relocation-steps.ts (new): relocationMessagePipelines — a plain
config step array. discover writes state.mediaContainerData; stamp reads the
track's own discovered origin (Tier 1) -> timestampOffset. Steps read composition
state from call-time deps; coordinate with the reactor only through the slot.
- segment-loader: StepDeps widened with the composition {state,context,config}
(opaque conduit; the loader never reads them).
- primitives/head-peek.ts (new): generic eager head-peek (replaces origin-discoverer).
- media/types: Track.startMediaTime + MediaContainerData.
- setup-buffer-actors: relocation pipelines from config; threads composition deps.
- engine: composes the reactor + bakes relocationMessagePipelines + mediaContainerData
+ deriveStartMediaTime config, comment-marked for easy removal.
- Deleted relocation.ts, origin-discoverer.ts. Doc + backlog updated.
Deferred (backlog): per-type keying; non-0th-segment origin (#4 — non-zero starts
currently mis-relocate); tier-agnostic apply; text-cue relocation; Tier 2 min;
audio-only wiring.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Design Docs
Decisions you own — documented for posterity.
What Belongs Here
Design Docs are decisions you own. Write one when:
- Making architectural decisions in your area
- Choosing between implementation approaches
- Introducing design patterns others will follow
- Documenting internal APIs or component specs
When to Use RFC Instead
Use an RFC (rfc/) when:
- Changes public API surface
- Affects product direction
- Affects user-facing developer experience
- Significant changes to core architecture
- Hard to reverse once shipped
Rule of thumb: If you need someone else's approval, it's an RFC. If you're documenting your own decision, it's a Design Doc.
Format
---
status: decided
date: 2025-01-27
---
# Title
## Decision
What you decided. Be direct.
## Context
Why this came up. What problem triggered the decision.
## Alternatives Considered
- **Option A** — Why not chosen
- **Option B** — Why not chosen
## Rationale
Why this choice wins. Keep concise.
Status Values
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
draft |
Thinking through it, not final |
decided |
Decision made, documented |
implemented |
Built and shipped — kept for rationale |
superseded |
Replaced by another design doc |
Archive
archive/ contains design docs for fully implemented features where the "what" is now captured by the code itself. These docs are preserved for reference but are no longer actively maintained. Docs with high "why" value (decisions, rationale, alternatives) stay in the main directory with status: implemented.
File Naming
Use lowercase with hyphens:
queue-design.md
hook-naming.md
skin-theming.md