Files
v10/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/2.feature_request.yml
T
2026-04-06 15:47:37 -05:00

85 lines
3.2 KiB
YAML

name: 💎 Feature Request
description: Request a new feature or enhancement
type: enhancement
labels: [triage]
title: 'Feature: '
body:
- type: markdown
attributes:
value: |
Thanks for taking the time to file an enhancement report! Please fill this template out as completely as possible.
* If you are not requesting a new feature or enhancement, but want to ask a general question, use [discussions](https://github.com/videojs/v10/discussions) instead.
* Check the [docs](https://videojs.org/docs).
* Please check to see if there's an existing issue or discussion and, if so, reply there instead.
* Please provide as much detail as you can.
- type: checkboxes
attributes:
label: Should this be a feature proposal discussion?
description: |
Video.js 10 currently uses [feature proposal discussions](https://github.com/videojs/v10/discussions) for larger feature requests, proposals, and discussions
options:
- label: This is not a substantial change
required: true
- type: checkboxes
attributes:
label: Is there an existing issue for this?
description: Please search to see if an issue already exists for the bug you encountered.
options:
- label: I have searched the existing issues and discussions
required: true
- type: dropdown
id: packages
validations:
required: true
attributes:
label: Which package(s) does this apply to? Select all that apply
multiple: true
options:
- Core (@videojs/core)
- Icons (@videojs/icons)
- HTML (@videojs/html)
- React (@videojs/react)
- SPF (@videojs/spf)
- Utils (@videojs/utils)
- type: textarea
id: motivation
validations:
required: true
attributes:
label: Motivation
description: |
What are you trying to accomplish? Which kind of user is this for? Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is more useful in the real world.
- type: textarea
id: description
validations:
required: true
attributes:
label: Description
description: |
Please provide as much information about the feature or enhancement as
possible. Include images or screenshots if needed.
- type: textarea
id: expectedbehavior
validations:
required: true
attributes:
label: Expected Behavior
- type: textarea
id: alternatives
validations:
required: true
attributes:
label: Alternatives and Workarounds
description: |
Please describe any alternatives or workarounds you have considered that could be used instead of this feature.
placeholder: |
It's possible to achieve the same result by waiting for the `loadstart` event and manually invoking the `foo()` method, but this is creates significantly more complexity for developers compared to the proposal.
- type: textarea
id: prior-art
validations:
required: false
attributes:
label: Examples in other libraries
description: |
Provide links to any equivalent examples of this feature or functionality implemented in other libraries (if applicable).